Posts Tagged ‘bill maher’

New Rules


2009
09.02

Bill Maher’s New Rules, a collection of his politically incorrect commentary, denigrates everything from Bush to celebrity flashers to terrorism to virginity pledges, with a dash of humour, lots of audacity and at least one reference to some aspect of popular culture.

It fuels my liberal leanings with a flourish, and inspired by his observations, I have some penned some new rules of my own.

Marriages made in hell

NEW RULE

I’ve observed that only friends and acquaintances with the worst marriages advocate the institution (with some exceptions, of course, and I am not factoring in well-meaning aunts, uncles and cousins).

They cite morbid examples such as “my spinster cousin who is 45 and not married is frustrated, miserable”. My chatty 28-year old maid who has three kids and a cold husband, who takes her nowhere, is one of them. This morning she ranted on, and I asked her if she was happy in her’s. “Nahi, meri barbaadi ho gayi (no, I am destroyed!),” she said, like reflex. Then she changed her mind about my impending nuptials.

Now, the couples in happy marriages react very differently. They want to stay well-informed about the exploits of their single friends, right down to the gory details. Hubby and wifey will make the time of day of you, you shall have their undivided attention over good food and wine, and there shall be chuckles. Lots of them.

So, my advice to not-so-lucky married people, whenever you find yourself advocating the institution to unsuspecting singles, zip it. They shall marry, if and when the time is right, and for the right reasons, and not due to some bourgeois societal norm.

Save it

NEW RULE

It’s a little naïve (and somewhat cheesy), when dating couples cite this particular reason for saving themselves for the honeymoon suite, “We must save at least something for after marriage”.

A male friend of mine has a novel perspective on this. The true test of any relationship is to see what remains once consummation is complete. Do you still enjoy each other’s company? Do you still have s’omething to talk about? Can you be in the same room? Do you already have a case of the roving eye?

On a different note, it’s interesting to know that most ‘savers’, have explored all other ‘loopholes’ (in Bill-speak), if you know what I mean, which defeats the purpose of doing any saving (for religious reasons or others) in the first place.

Share

Cheap books


2009
08.31

I attended the Delhi Book Fair at Pragati Maidan, and noted that the diversity of the madding crowds transcended class, community, religion and nationality, unlike the usual suspects at the Crosswords and Oxfords of the country.

One stall in particular was bursting at the seams with voracious readers.

Was it Penguin? No.
Was it Sage? No.
Was it Katha? No.

The name of the stall: ‘English Novel – Rs 25/- only’.

One man emerged triumphantly with 50 books (yes, I counted) in a plastic bag, most in mint condition, and in hardback.

As I tried to get a foothold into the stall, an elderly gentleman asked the man in charge of collecting the moolah, with disbelief,” Yeh zyaada sastha tho nahi ho gaya (isn’t this price a tad too less)?”

I picked up politically incorrect Bill Maher’s New Rules. I would have fished for some more, but there were two many armpits in my nose (akin to a Mumbai local), and the couple in front of me looked like they weren’t going anywhere for the next decade.

Share

Happy ‘n’ Gay


2009
07.03

On the way to work this morning, I voraciously combed the paper for all dope on the HC’s judgement to decriminalise homosexuality. My eyes grew moist, as I thought about all my friends in the gay community.

Yesterday’s high court judgement was long overdue. But a colleague observed with scepticism, “I doubt it will change the perception of gay people in India. This media is simply hyping things.”

Maybe.

But imagine the sheer confidence  that any gay person would feel, knowing that he or she could now legally exercise their own sexual preference in this country? Well, not the entire country, yet (but when the capital takes the lead, the rest of the country will hopefully follow suit. Fancy this happening in Delhi, which is perceived more conservative and insensitive than say Mumbai or Bangalore).

This fact changes everything.

No longer does a gay person need to be quiet when harassed, blackmailed, extorted or jailed. Besides, gay people seem to always be associated with more promiscuity. I quizzed a gay friend of mine about this, and he responded that one reason could be that all liaisons and relationships need to be conducted in secret, because your have the law against you. They can’t get married, claim mediclaim for their partner, et al.

I feel sad that Christian groups in India are investing time and energy in opposing this  judgment. What ever happened to tolerance?

Bill Maher conducted a borderline comical interview in his documentary Religulous, where he interviews a gay chap who turned pastor and claims to be a straight pastor. In other words he was ‘cured’ of his condition.

Bill flirts with him, in his typical brazen style, and it’s obvious that the pastor naturally responded to it. All that suppression is SUCH a waste of energy. Besides, if we just allowed gay people to be happily gay, I think this world would have a lot more character. Touche.

The LA Times features an empathetic piece on this development:

Personally, I think that though the Indian media is indeed going to town by sensationalising things, which can sometimes be a good thing, they do report with a little more empathy, and not make a carnival of the whole event. Some restraint and empathy, is the need of the hour for the Indian media in this country.

Share